Summary of Del Puerto Canyon Reservoir Final Environmental Impact Report, Part I

At the western edge of the Great Central Valley, within Stanislaus County, lies a canyon of cultural, biological and geological significance.  A rift in the earth slicing through the Coast Ranges, the canyon exposes millions of years of geologic history, and shows evidence of being occupied by humans long before European settlers arrived on the scene.  A spring at the heart of the canyon feeds into an intermittent stream, bordered by oasis-like pockets of riparian wetlands, cottonwoods, sycamores and ephemeral pools.  In the spring, grasslands within the canyon are verdant with a luxurious covering of new growth and dotted with annual wildflowers, while steep canyon walls are adorned with hardy chaparral and oak scrub habitat.  In the autumn, western sycamores and Fremont cottonwoods lining the creek put on a color show no less spectacular for its subtleness.  

This is, of course, Del Puerto Canyon.

And this canyon is in imminent danger of being dammed and flooded, its rich habitat and cultural heritage lost forever.



I don't expect that my humble words have any power to sway the almighty decision-makers behind this proposed project, but my hope is that someone will read my message and learn to think twice about the heavy impact we as humans have on the natural world around us.

Footprint of the proposed reservoir in Del Puerto Canyon. 
Source: https://delpuertocanyonreservoir.com/
The proposed dam would flood the lower part of the canyon, covering about 800 acres and holding up to 82,000 acre feet of water (source), amounting to a relatively small reservoir in our area.  (To put it in perspective, San Luis and Don Pedro Reservoirs both have surface areas of just over 12,000 acres and both hold around two million acre feet of water.  Is increasing storage capacity of existing reservoirs an option?  Especially as sedimentation reduces water storage capacity?  I am not informed enough in this area, but one has to wonder.)



Water issues in the West are often touted as being complex, and indeed they are, at least as they relate to politics and policy.  Really, the issues are quite simple: in the arid West, there is not enough water to indefinitely support the levels of water consumption demanded by agricultural (and residential) users.  Why we, as Valley residents, get virtually unlimited water (which is largely misused) at such a low cost boggles my mind.  Why farmers and land owners are allowed to plow up thousands of acres of grassland - i.e. unirrigated rangeland - in the foothills (as all valley floor land is already taken) to plant water-demanding monocultures of wine grapes and almonds is a question that makes me crazy.  

Maybe we don't need more water storage after all.  Maybe we just need to rethink our current rate of water use and commit to living in a way that befits our arid climate!  Even if more water storage is built, what guarantee is there that water will be available to fill it?  Are we to starve our rivers and streams, holding so much water in reservoirs that there is none left to reach the Delta, like the case with the Colorado River in Mexico?  But I digress.

If additional water storage must be constructed, Del Puerto is not the only canyon in the Coast Ranges that has the potential to support a reservoir such as this.  Opponents of the Del Puerto Canyon site have suggested several other canyons as alternatives, most favorably a site about ten miles north.  If a dam must be built, an alternative site to Del Puerto Canyon would be preferred!


Arguments against damming and flooding Del Puerto Canyon include:

  • Flood risk to the city of Patterson in the event of dam failure or landslides within the reservoir
    • According to the report, the construction of a dam at the mouth of Del Puerto Canyon would have a high likelihood of causing "potential substantial adverse effect, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: strong seismic ground shaking; seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction; [and] landslides."  It would also be located on "a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the Project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction, or collapse;" and "expansive soil... creating substantial direct or indirect risks to life or property."
  • Loss of access to an area used heavily for education and recreation
    • I have spent countless happy hours exploring the natural wonders of the canyon, on my own as well as with guided field trips to study the botany, geology and wildlife of the canyon.  As the only publicly accessible canyon in our county, Del Puerto Canyon is one of Stanislaus County's premier birding sites, as well as a living laboratory showcasing the geology of the Coast Ranges.  Losing access to this site as an educational resource would be a great loss to our community, an area already suffering from a lack of knowledge of and connectedness to the natural world, as well as so-called "brain drain."  
  • Loss of geological resources 
    • The proposed dam would "directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature."  In the 1930's, California's first dinosaur fossil, a type of hadrosaur or duck-billed dinosaur called a Saurolophus, was found in the canyon, within the area that would be flooded.  Additionally, the canyon walls provide a nearly perfect geologic record of the Coast Ranges, with pieces of the earth's mantle exposed in several places.
  • Loss of cultural resources
    • Del Puerto Canyon was home to Yokuts people for thousands of years before Europeans arrived, as evidenced by grinding rocks and other cultural artefacts.  According to the report, "site P-50-344 is a prehistoric occupation site consisting of four bedrock mortars and cupule features, an artifact surface scatter of lithic debitage (stone chips and flakes from making stone tools), groundstone (a stone tool for grinding) fragments, and one obsidian biface tool fragment located along the slope and base of a hill overlooking Del Puerto Creek to the south. Subsurface testing at the site identified a deposit of lithic debitage, a bone awl fragment, burned faunal material, freshwater mussel shell fragments and marine shell beads. The features and artifact deposit at the site are indicative of habitation along Del Puerto Creek, containing information important in prehistory, specifically to the prehistoric inhabitants of the local area."  There is a high likelihood that the proposed dam would "cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource...; cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a unique archaeological resource...; [and] disturb... human remains, including those interred outside of dedicated cemeteries."
  • Loss of habitat and biological resources
    • Just take a look at the chart below, as it appears in the report.
Del Puerto Canyon Reservoir Final EIR Vol. II  Appendices, page 25 of PDF.  https://delpuertocanyonreservoir.com/assets/pdf/reports/Del-Puerto-Canyon-Reservoir-Final-EIR-Vol-II-Appendices.pdf


Read the final environmental impact report by following the links below.

Vol. I (421 pages) https://delpuertocanyonreservoir.com/assets/pdf/reports/Del-Puerto-Canyon-Reservoir-Final-EIR-Vol-I.pdf

Vol. II (786 pages) https://delpuertocanyonreservoir.com/assets/pdf/reports/Del-Puerto-Canyon-Reservoir-Final-EIR-Vol-II-Appendices.pdf


Stay tuned for Part II of this series, where we will take a look at the specific species that are at risk of being displaced by the dam project.

Comments

Post a Comment

You Might Also Like:

Birds of the Desert: Residents & Spring Migrants

Image
Nearly everyone knows the desert as a barren, desolate land of extremes: high heat, low precipitation; little available food and water; prickly, spiny, unfriendly plants growing in a sea of rocks and sand as far as the eye can see.  But for those who stop and look closer, the desert reveals itself as the beautiful, incredible, mesmerizing place it truly is, teeming with unexpected life. Juvenile male Costa's Hummingbird visiting chuparosa blooms next to our campsite in Anza-Borrego Desert State Park. I particularly love the desert in the spring, when the annual wildflowers, cacti, flowering trees and shrubs are all in bloom.  (I've experienced the desert in the searing 120 degree heat of summer, and the rainy, even snowy cold of winter... and spring wins every time!)  Eric and I just returned from a week in the Colorado desert, exploring the imperiled, accidental Salton Sea (more on that coming soon), the vital wetlands of the Sonny Bono Salton Sea National Wildlife Refu
Read more

A Shorebird Primer: Godwits, Curlews, Willets and Whimbrels

Image
For those of us living in the Great Central Valley, autumn is the time to head to the coast.  Of course, there is no bad time to visit California's magnificent coastline.  But as the heat and haze of summer drag on in the Valley, the sea becomes increasingly tantalizing: September and the onset of autumn bring sunny weather and an abundance of migratory seabirds and shorebirds to our coast. A new birder visiting California's Central Coast will undoubtedly be met with a splendid array of very confusing birds.  Among these are small shorebirds like  "peeps" (sandpipers), Sanderlings and various  plovers .  But the larger birds can be just as confusing, until you learn a few distinguishing features.  Four large shorebirds that are commonly seen (and commonly confused) along California's Central Coast are Godwits, Curlews, Willets and Whimbrels. Marbled Godwit (upper left), Whimbrel (upper right), Long-billed Curlew (center front) The distinguishing featu
Read more

Birding in Adverse Weather Conditions: Wind and Rain

Image
Though I often extol the virtues and merits of winter in the Central Valley , especially when it comes to birding, the whole truth is that we experience "bad" weather also, just like anywhere else.  But even when the winter weather rolls in, the birds are still out there!  And sometimes, despite our best planning efforts, a birding day happens to coincide with crummy weather.   In that case, what's a birder to do?  Usually, we go birding anyway!   Birders far more intrepid than I regularly brave the ice and snow of northern winters to see their favorite birds, so perhaps you should look to them for real tips on winter birding!  For those of us in the valleys of California, the worst weather we see - wind and rain - is really comparatively mild.  Birding on an extremely windy day! I don't know of anyone who actually likes birding in the rain.  But I would argue that birding in the wind is just as aggravating as trying to bird in the rain!   Wind can be utterly infuri
Read more

What's Wrong With This Tree?

Image
If you've spent any time in an oak woodland (and I sincerely hope that you have!!) you may have noticed something odd: strange growths on the branches and leaves of oak trees.  You might wonder if the trees are sick or diseased, or plagued with a dangerous pest. But not to worry; these fascinating growths are a normal part of a healthy oak community.  Spined Turban Gall on Valley Oak, with a bonus gall: the tiny orange sphere to the left of the larger gall might be a gall of the California Jumping Gall Wasp (inconclusive) These growths are in fact galls, and are caused by a variety of cynipid wasps.  Galls form when a wasp lays eggs in a plant's tissue, releasing chemicals which stimulate the plant to use its own tissue to form protective structures around the eggs.  As the insect larvae develops, it feeds on plant tissue from within its cozy gall home.  Galls form on a variety of plants, including alders, poplars, willows and even sagebrush.  But the best known and m
Read more

Joshua Tree Woodlands: A Tale of Sloths, Moths and the Trees that Need Them

Image
In 1844, early California explorer John C. Fremont gave a somewhat scathing review of Joshua trees when he wrote, "...their stiff and ungraceful form makes them to the traveler the most repulsive tree in the vegetable kingdom."  Rather unkind, don't you think?  But when Joshua trees were formally described by scientist William Trelease in the 1890's, he noted that Joshua Trees are "the most attractive of all the Yuccas."  I am inclined to agree with this sentiment, and must disagree most heartily with Lieutenant Fremont! I, for one, adore Joshua Trees, with their whimsical shapes and great ecological significance!  If you struggle with plant identification, the iconic Joshua tree, hallmark of the Mojave Desert, is a good place to start.  With densely spiked tufts protruding from the ends of gangly arms stretched towards the heavens, this looks like a plant straight from a Dr. Seuss book.  Native people called these trees “humwichawa,” and used thei
Read more

Invasive Species: European Beachgrass

Image
Visit a beach in California, particularly in the northern half of the state, and you are likely to come across stands of European Beachgrass ( Arundo arenaria ).  It looks so innocuous, picturesque even, waving in the Pacific breeze and blurring the line between land and sea.  But this grass, a plant you've probably never thought twice about, is much more than it seems.  Innocuous it is not.  European Beachgrass is one of California's most wanted offenders: an introduced, aggressive invasive species. This picturesque photo of the California's Pacific Coast has a secret...  Most people won't notice that the grass seen here is an imposter; it's not native to the area, but a species that doesn't belong in this ecosystem. The main crime this grass is guilty of is being too good at its job.  In 1869, European Beachgrass was planted around Golden Gate Park in San Francisco, and since 1900, it has been introduced to other parts of California's coast in an
Read more